AWS Migration Success Criteria

A concise checklist across technical, operational, and business dimensions for servers migrated to AWS.

 

1 Technical Success Criteria

a) Functionality Validation

  • All migrated applications and services function as expected post-migration.
  • Application dependencies (databases, APIs, fileshares, DNS, IAM roles) are correctly re-mapped and reachable.
  • No critical errors in system logs post-migration.

b) Performance & Latency

  • Application response times meet or exceed pre-migration benchmarks.
  • Network latency between tiers (app ↔ DB, app ↔ external APIs) remains within acceptable limits.
  • AWS instance type sizing matches performance and cost expectations.

c) Data Integrity

  • 100% data consistency verified between source and target (checksums, row counts, object validation).
  • Database and filesystem replication verified with no corruption.
  • Point-in-time recovery and backup integrity confirmed.

d) Security & Compliance

  • All IAM roles, security groups, and NACLs adhere to least-privilege principles.
  • Encryption in transit (TLS) and at rest (KMS, EBS, S3) confirmed.
  • Compliance checks pass (CIS, NIST, PCI DSS, ISO 27001 as applicable).

e) Monitoring & Observability

  • Amazon CloudWatch metrics, logs, and alarms configured for CPU, memory, disk, and network.
  • Centralized logging (e.g., CloudWatch Logs, OpenSearch, or Splunk) integrated.
  • Application health checks configured via ALB/ELB.

2 Operational Success Criteria

a) Cutover and Rollback

  • Cutover completed within maintenance window with minimal downtime.
  • Validated rollback plan (AMI snapshot, DMS rollback, or DR restore) tested and documented.
  • No orphaned or untagged resources left behind post-migration.

b) Automation & Manageability

  • Backups automated (AWS Backup, EBS snapshots, RDS automated backups).
  • Patch management via Systems Manager Patch Manager or 3rd-party tool configured.
  • Infrastructure-as-Code (CloudFormation/Terraform) implemented for repeatability.

c) Access & Identity

  • Correct IAM mappings for system/service accounts.
  • No hardcoded credentials; secrets stored in AWS Secrets Manager or Parameter Store.
  • MFA enforced for administrative access.

3 Business & Financial Success Criteria

a) Cost Efficiency

  • Cost comparison shows ≥10–30% reduction from on-prem TCO or expected parity with improved elasticity.
  • Reserved Instances or Savings Plans adopted where workloads are steady-state.
  • Resource utilization optimized (no oversized instances).

b) Uptime & Availability

  • Meets SLAs (e.g., ≥99.9% uptime).
  • Multi-AZ or multi-region high-availability tested successfully.
  • Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO) achieved.

c) Stakeholder Sign-Off

  • Application owners validate successful migration.
  • End-users report no degradation in usability.
  • Security, compliance, and operations teams approve go-live state.

4 Sample Success Criteria Summary Table

Use this table during cutover readiness reviews and post-cutover validation.
Category Criteria Validation Method
Functionality Apps running as expected Functional test plan
Performance Response time < pre-migration baseline CloudWatch / synthetic tests
Data Integrity 100% checksum match Automated validation scripts
Security Encryption & IAM validated AWS Config / Security Hub
Availability ≥ 99.9% uptime post-cutover Health checks
Cost Within projected TCO AWS Cost Explorer / CUR
Compliance Passes audits Audit report sign-off
Business Approval Owner sign-off Change record closure
Tip: Track each criterion per application/workload, record evidence links (Runbooks, IaC repos,
Config rules, Security Hub findings), and attach screenshots for audit readiness.

 

Prepared for migration wave tracking and post-cutover documentation.