AWS Migration Success Criteria
AWS Migration Success Criteria
A concise checklist across technical, operational, and business dimensions for servers migrated to AWS.
1 Technical Success Criteria
a) Functionality Validation
- All migrated applications and services function as expected post-migration.
- Application dependencies (databases, APIs, fileshares, DNS, IAM roles) are correctly re-mapped and reachable.
- No critical errors in system logs post-migration.
b) Performance & Latency
- Application response times meet or exceed pre-migration benchmarks.
- Network latency between tiers (app ↔ DB, app ↔ external APIs) remains within acceptable limits.
- AWS instance type sizing matches performance and cost expectations.
c) Data Integrity
- 100% data consistency verified between source and target (checksums, row counts, object validation).
- Database and filesystem replication verified with no corruption.
- Point-in-time recovery and backup integrity confirmed.
d) Security & Compliance
- All IAM roles, security groups, and NACLs adhere to least-privilege principles.
- Encryption in transit (TLS) and at rest (KMS, EBS, S3) confirmed.
- Compliance checks pass (CIS, NIST, PCI DSS, ISO 27001 as applicable).
e) Monitoring & Observability
- Amazon CloudWatch metrics, logs, and alarms configured for CPU, memory, disk, and network.
- Centralized logging (e.g., CloudWatch Logs, OpenSearch, or Splunk) integrated.
- Application health checks configured via ALB/ELB.
2 Operational Success Criteria
a) Cutover and Rollback
- Cutover completed within maintenance window with minimal downtime.
- Validated rollback plan (AMI snapshot, DMS rollback, or DR restore) tested and documented.
- No orphaned or untagged resources left behind post-migration.
b) Automation & Manageability
- Backups automated (AWS Backup, EBS snapshots, RDS automated backups).
- Patch management via Systems Manager Patch Manager or 3rd-party tool configured.
- Infrastructure-as-Code (CloudFormation/Terraform) implemented for repeatability.
c) Access & Identity
- Correct IAM mappings for system/service accounts.
- No hardcoded credentials; secrets stored in AWS Secrets Manager or Parameter Store.
- MFA enforced for administrative access.
3 Business & Financial Success Criteria
a) Cost Efficiency
- Cost comparison shows ≥10–30% reduction from on-prem TCO or expected parity with improved elasticity.
- Reserved Instances or Savings Plans adopted where workloads are steady-state.
- Resource utilization optimized (no oversized instances).
b) Uptime & Availability
- Meets SLAs (e.g., ≥99.9% uptime).
- Multi-AZ or multi-region high-availability tested successfully.
- Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO) achieved.
c) Stakeholder Sign-Off
- Application owners validate successful migration.
- End-users report no degradation in usability.
- Security, compliance, and operations teams approve go-live state.
4 Sample Success Criteria Summary Table
Use this table during cutover readiness reviews and post-cutover validation.
| Category | Criteria | Validation Method |
|---|---|---|
| Functionality | Apps running as expected | Functional test plan |
| Performance | Response time < pre-migration baseline | CloudWatch / synthetic tests |
| Data Integrity | 100% checksum match | Automated validation scripts |
| Security | Encryption & IAM validated | AWS Config / Security Hub |
| Availability | ≥ 99.9% uptime post-cutover | Health checks |
| Cost | Within projected TCO | AWS Cost Explorer / CUR |
| Compliance | Passes audits | Audit report sign-off |
| Business Approval | Owner sign-off | Change record closure |
Tip: Track each criterion per application/workload, record evidence links (Runbooks, IaC repos,
Config rules, Security Hub findings), and attach screenshots for audit readiness.
Config rules, Security Hub findings), and attach screenshots for audit readiness.
Leave a Reply